Chronicles Woven in Runes
Tomorrow’s FIFA match is France vs England, and honestly… my Acadian ancestors are probably warming up in the celestial bleachers. France is stretching, England is smirking, and I’m over here remembering juice boxes, orange slices, and tiny cleats flying in every direction.
My kids played soccer, baseball, and did scouts — so I’ve spent years cheering from folding chairs, pretending I understood the rules, and celebrating every goal like it was the World Cup. So if I yell at the TV tomorrow, it’s purely muscle memory.
May France and England battle it out with dignity… and may my ancestors forgive me if I cheer for whichever team has the cutest uniforms. 🇫🇷🇬🇧
There are moments in history — and in our own lives — when hope feels like a small flame held against a vast, uncertain world. This story was inspired by an AI‑created illustration of a young Acadian girl standing on a twilight cliff, lantern in hand, watching the sea with quiet strength.
Her image stirred something ancient and familiar: the resilience of Acadian families, the way faith becomes a compass, and how light — even a single lantern — can guide someone home.
Below is the story that grew from that image, written in the spirit of remembrance, gentleness, and the enduring Acadian heart.
On a personal note:
Next week, on the 23rd, my youngest daughter celebrates her birthday. I wanted to do something meaningful for her — something created from the heart — and though money is tight, love never is. So I chose to write this story and dedicate it to her.Rachael’s love for her dad has always been sweet and uniquely her own. She carries a deep appreciation and respect for him that has blessed our family for decades, and I treasure that about her.
In celebration of her 47th year of life, I dedicate this story to our beautiful daughter, Rachael Lopez.
Happy Birthday, Sweetheart. You are a light all your own.
The wind carried the scent of salt and pine as Élodie Broussard stood on the cliff’s edge, her shawl fluttering like a crimson wing. Below her, the sea breathed in slow rhythm, its waves whispering against the rocks as if remembering every voyage that had ever crossed its surface. The lantern in her hand glowed softly, a fragile sun against the deepening dusk.
She had come here every evening since her father’s ship failed to return. The villagers said the sea had claimed him, as it had claimed so many Acadian souls before — but Élodie refused to believe that the ocean could swallow faith whole.
The Acadian flag beside her snapped in the wind, its golden star catching the last light of the setting sun. That star, her mother had told her, was the Stella Maris — the Star of the Sea — guiding those who wandered far from home.
Tonight, Élodie whispered to it. “Guide him back to me.”
Down the slope, the village of Saint‑Pierre glowed with lamplight. Smoke curled from chimneys, and the church bell tolled softly, calling the faithful to evening prayer. The sound drifted upward, mingling with the sigh of the waves.
Élodie’s mother, Cécile, waited by the chapel door, her hands folded around a rosary worn smooth by years of prayer. She had stopped asking Élodie to come down before dark. The girl’s vigil had become a kind of sacred ritual — one that neither mother nor priest dared interrupt.
“Let her stand,” Father Armand had said once. “Faith sometimes needs wind and silence more than words.”
And so Élodie stood, each night, lantern raised like a promise.
She remembered the morning her father left — the harbor alive with gulls and laughter, the ship’s sails swelling like the hearts of those who believed in new beginnings. He had kissed her forehead and said, “Keep the light burning, ma petite. The sea always finds its way home.”
She had laughed then, not knowing how heavy those words would become.
When the storm came weeks later, it tore through the coast with a fury that felt biblical. The villagers prayed, the mothers wept, and the sea roared as if answering every plea with thunder.
In the days that followed, wreckage washed ashore — planks, ropes, a single boot. But no bodies. No names.
Élodie refused to let the lantern go dark.
On the seventh night after the storm, as the sun melted into the horizon, Élodie saw a flicker of light far out at sea — faint, uncertain, but real.
Her breath caught.
It wasn’t lightning. It wasn’t a star. It was a lantern, bobbing on the waves.
She ran down the cliff path, her skirts gathering dew and bramble. The villagers saw her and followed, their own lanterns swinging like fireflies.
By the time they reached the shore, the tide had carried in a small boat — battered, half‑broken, but alive. Inside lay a man, his hair silvered by salt, his hands clutching a wooden cross.
Her father.
He was weak, but smiling. “Your light,” he whispered, “I saw it through the storm.”
The villagers lifted him gently, carrying him toward the chapel. Élodie walked beside him, lantern still burning.
That night, the church glowed brighter than it ever had. The priest said it was a miracle. The fishermen said it was luck. Élodie said nothing — she only watched the flame dance inside the glass, steady and golden.
Her father’s ship had been lost, but his faith had not.
Years later, when Élodie herself became a mother, she told her children the story of the lantern — how it had guided a soul home through darkness.
She taught them that hope was not a thing to be shouted into the wind, but held quietly, like a flame cupped in trembling hands.
And when she grew old, she passed the lantern to her daughter, Marie, saying, “Keep it burning. Not for me, but for anyone who needs to find their way.”
Marie carried it to the same cliff, where the Acadian flag still waved against the twilight. The sea below was calm, the village lights steady.
She lifted the lantern high, and for a moment, the world seemed to pause — as if heaven itself leaned closer to listen.
Long after Élodie’s time, travelers who visited Saint‑Pierre spoke of a light that could be seen from miles away — a single lantern glowing on the cliff at dusk.
Some said it was a trick of the sun. Others said it was the spirit of a girl who refused to let hope drown.
But the elders knew better.
They said the lantern was the heart of Acadia itself — a reminder that even when the world scatters its people like seeds across continents, the light of home still burns.
And if you stand on that cliff at twilight, you might hear the whisper of waves saying her name.
Élodie.
Keeper of the light.
www.godreports.com/2018/04/jewish-atheist-found-god-at-stanford/
At just eleven years old, Barak Lurie declared himself an atheist. Not out of rebellion, trauma, or philosophical sophistication — but out of what he now calls the childish simplicity of assuming that what cannot be touched must not exist.
“If you can’t see, hear, smell, or touch God,” he recalls, “it’s very easy for a child to say, ‘Well, I can’t see Him. Therefore, He doesn’t exist.’”
Raised in a non‑observant Jewish home in Connecticut, Lurie grew up in a culture where God was rarely mentioned except in jest. His parents believed in God but never imposed faith. School reinforced skepticism. And young Barak, bright and curious, leaned into it. He journaled arguments, devoured Ayn Rand, and sharpened his atheism into something almost evangelistic.
“I wanted to find arguments for my atheism,” he says. “I pushed it by talking to other people about it.”
—
When Lurie arrived at Stanford University, he expected his atheism to deepen. After all, many students watch their faith erode under the scorn of professors. But something unexpected happened.
He chose an undergraduate honors thesis designed to prove the famous mantra:
Religion has caused the deaths of untold millions.
“I set out to prove it,” he says. “And within two weeks of deep research, I realized — I am really wrong on this.”
His research revealed that atheistic regimes — Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot — were responsible for ten times more killings than Christianity, totaling roughly 200 million deaths in just 80 years.
It was a discovery that embarrassed him. The evidence had been there all along. But the implications ran deeper than statistics.
If atheism produced such devastation, what did that say about the worldview he had embraced?
—
In his philosophy courses, Lurie encountered a problem atheism couldn’t solve: free will.
True atheists, he realized, must logically be determinists — the sum of their influences, with no moral responsibility. But Lurie knew he made choices. He knew he was accountable. And accountability implies a Creator who endowed humanity with agency.
“Once I accepted that I had free will,” he says, “I opened the door to the possibility that there was a Creator.”
From there, more questions followed:
• Where does beauty come from?
• Where does love come from?
• Why do humans create art, music, humor?
• Why do we seek meaning at all?
None of these could be explained by pure Darwinian evolution, he concluded. Biology alone cannot account for sunsets, symphonies, or sacrifice.
“Not one of our human values can be explained by evolution,” he says.
—
Lurie also confronted the staggering improbability that the universe — ordered, beautiful, and finely tuned — could arise by chance.
Even famed atheist Stephen Hawking acknowledged the impossibility. Yet Hawking clung to atheism by proposing a multiverse, a theoretical escape hatch to avoid the conclusion of a Creator.
To Lurie, this was telling:
“When randomness fails, atheism must invent new universes.”
—
As Lurie continued his thesis, he focused on Fyodor Dostoevsky — a writer who wrestled deeply with atheism before returning to faith.
“You cannot truly appreciate God unless you have rejected God,” Dostoevsky wrote.
Lurie resonated with that. His own rejection had sharpened his eventual belief.
By the time he finished his thesis, he had rediscovered God — slowly, thoughtfully, and profoundly. He began reconnecting with his Jewish roots, attending synagogue, and rebuilding a worldview he had once dismantled.
“It was like learning a second language,” he says.
—
Lurie also confronted the staggering improbability that the universe — ordered, beautiful, and finely tuned — could arise by chance.
Even famed atheist Stephen Hawking acknowledged the impossibility. Yet Hawking clung to atheism by proposing a multiverse, a theoretical escape hatch to avoid the conclusion of a Creator.
To Lurie, this was telling:
“When randomness fails, atheism must invent new universes.”
—
Lurie’s journey has also led him to appreciate Christianity deeply. He and fellow Jewish thinker Dennis Prager often discuss how closely Christian ethics align with Jewish values.
“I would love for this whole world to become Christian,” he says. “We need people who subscribe to the Ten Commandments.”
He now serves on boards including PragerU, Stand With Us, and the Jewish National Fund, advocating for Western values and religious heritage.
—
Today, Barak Lurie is a husband, father of three, attorney, author, radio host, and outspoken defender of faith. His story is a reminder that sometimes the search for truth leads us exactly where we least expect.
He set out to prove religion was deadly.
Instead, he discovered God.
—
A gentle reflection for the weary, creative heart
Some days, creativity arrives like a sunrise — warm, bright, eager to spill across the page. And some days… it doesn’t. Some days feel foggy, heavy, slow. The mind moves like it’s wading through water, and even simple tasks feel like lifting stones.
I used to think foggy days meant failure. That if I couldn’t write with clarity, I shouldn’t write at all. But over time — through journals, prayer, quiet nights in Hawkins, and the soft glow of a candle on my bedside table — I’ve learned something gentler:
Fog doesn’t mean the light is gone. It only means the light is diffused.
On fog-days, creativity doesn’t disappear. It whispers.
It shows up in smaller ways:
a sentence that feels true,
a memory that rises unannounced,
a color you suddenly notice,
a prayer that steadies your breath.
These moments matter. They are seeds. And seeds don’t need bright sun to grow — they need presence, patience, and a little faith.
I’ve learned to write differently on fog-days. Not with pressure, but with softness. I let myself write in fragments, in half-thoughts, in gentle notes that may become something later. I let myself rest when I need to. I let myself trust that creativity is still alive, even when it feels quiet.
This is how the Fog-Day & Best-Day Wellness Journal was born — from the realization that life isn’t all clarity or all chaos. It’s both. And both deserve space.
If you’re reading this and you’ve been in a fog — creatively, emotionally, spiritually — I hope you hear this:
You are simply moving through a softer season, and there is beauty here too.
And when the best-days come — because they always do — you’ll have a trail of small, faithful notes that show you just how strong you were in the quiet.
You are not behind.
You are not failing.
You are not forgotten.
Write one sentence.
Light one candle.
Take one breath.
Let the fog be a place where God meets you gently.
Keep writing, even through the fog.
Your light is still here.
It’s just wrapped in softness today.
Recent discussions surrounding political figures and their views on which denominations are ‘truly Christian’ have brought a critical issue to the forefront of American public life: the preservation of religious freedom for everyone, not just for one’s own group.
It is common for different religious groups to debate doctrine and theology. However, a dangerous line is crossed when those theological disagreements move from the pulpit to the halls of government. Reports involving figures like pastor Doug Wilson, who has expressed a desire for a ‘Christian Republic’ that would exclude Latter-day Saints (and others who do not meet his definition of orthodoxy) from holding public office, serve as a warning. This is not just a theological dispute—it is a challenge to the constitutional principles of our nation.
Regardless of our individual faith, all Americans should be concerned about the concept of a ‘religious test.’ The U.S. Constitution’s Article VI explicitly states that no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification for any office or public trust. This protection is essential because:
• It prevents the state from defining legitimacy: Once the government has the power to decide which denominations are ‘real’ Christians or which faiths are ‘legitimate,’ it gains the power to dictate who belongs in public life.
• It protects agency: True freedom requires that individuals be free to choose their own faith without government-imposed barriers to their participation in society.
• It protects all minorities: A precedent that allows one group to exclude another based on theology today can just as easily be used to exclude other religious or non-religious groups tomorrow.
Defending religious freedom does not mean believers should retreat from public life or stop advocating for moral foundations. It means advocating for an environment where:
We can value America’s Christian foundations and the moral inheritance of our founding documents without resorting to theocracy. The best way to preserve our own liberty is to vigorously defend the same rights for those whose theology we might disagree with. By choosing to uphold the constitutional ban on religious tests, we protect the sacred principle of agency and ensure that America remains a land of freedom for all.
A calm, practical guide for using AI without letting it derail your research.
🔍 1. Keep AI in the “Safe Zone”
Use AI only for tasks that don’t affect the accuracy of your tree.
If a task requires interpretation, conclusions, or connecting people, keep it human.
⚠️ 2. Never Accept AI’s Genealogy “Facts”
AI can sound confident while being completely wrong.
Reject any AI output that includes:
If you can’t find the record yourself, it doesn’t exist.
📚 3. Verify Everything Against Primary Sources
Your safest workflow:
AI can assist your eyes — but not your conclusions.
🧭 4. Watch for Red Flags
Discard AI output immediately if you see:
Your intuition is a research tool. Trust it.
🧪 5. Test Before Trusting
When AI gives you information:
If it cannot provide specifics, the information is unsafe.
🧱 6. Keep Your Tree Protected
Your genealogy tree is fragile. Guard it by:
Your tree should never depend on AI.
🧘 7. Maintain a Skeptical Mindset
AI hallucinations happen even when you tell it not to.
Your mantra:
“AI is a tool, not a genealogist.”
Use it for language barriers, not lineage building.
🌿 8. Use AI for Creative Extras Only
Safe creative uses:
These enhance your work without touching your research accuracy.
⭐ Final Rule
If AI gives you a detail you cannot verify in a real archive, throw it out.
Your ancestors deserve truth, not guesses.
P.S. Here’s a cheat sheet, in case you’d like to download it.
A calm, practical guide for using AI without letting it derail your research.
🔍 1. Keep AI in the “Safe Zone”
Use AI only for tasks that don’t affect the accuracy of your tree.
If a task requires interpretation, conclusions, or connecting people, keep it human.
⚠️ 2. Never Accept AI’s Genealogy “Facts”
AI can sound confident while being completely wrong.
Reject any AI output that includes:
If you can’t find the record yourself, it doesn’t exist.
📚 3. Verify Everything Against Primary Sources
Your safest workflow:
AI can assist your eyes — but not your conclusions.
🧭 4. Watch for Red Flags
Discard AI output immediately if you see:
Your intuition is a research tool. Trust it.
🧪 5. Test Before Trusting
When AI gives you information:
If it cannot provide specifics, the information is unsafe.
🧱 6. Keep Your Tree Protected
Your genealogy tree is fragile. Guard it by:
Your tree should never depend on AI.
🧘 7. Maintain a Skeptical Mindset
AI hallucinations happen even when you tell it not to.
Your mantra:
“AI is a tool, not a genealogist.”
Use it for language barriers, not lineage building.
🌿 8. Use AI for Creative Extras Only
Safe creative uses:
These enhance your work without touching your research accuracy.
⭐ Final Rule
If AI gives you a detail you cannot verify in a real archive, throw it out.
Your ancestors deserve truth, not guesses.
NOTE: if you read the previous story about this, and are confused about seeing it again, please check the last part. It will explain why you’re seeing this again.
This story weaves a rich tapestry that connects the epic, historical resilience of ancestors directly, into a modern story of survival and extraordinary love.
Capturing the blacksmith roots, the grief of Acadians, and the mending of self and foster children, this story highlights the concept of an unbroken line of patriots and survivors.
The protagonist, (celebrating 50 years of marriage) reflects on her life of fostering over 200 children, adopting 3, and giving birth to 5. It explores her slow recovery from severe childhood trauma (parents divorced by age 4, a father with schizophrenia, a mother developmentally delayed to age 13, and enduring childhood physical and sexual abuse from alcohol addiction and mental illness). It details the hardships she and her husband overcame, including losing babies, and celebrates their clean, enduring romance.
Incorporating a cohesive parallel narrative arc, the story interweaves the historical trials of her ancestors (the Acadian expulsion, the Irish potato famine) with her own personal trials (childhood trauma, fostering 200 children), showing that the “patriot DNA” of survival was passed down to her, and through her children.
The Paternal Grandmother’s side: Direct descent from the legendary Acadian leader Joseph ‘Beausoleil’ Broussard, embodying the patriot spirit and the tragedy/triumph of the Acadian expulsion.
Beausoleil led the armed resistance against the British during the 18th-century Acadian Deportation and subsequently guided displaced exiles to safety in Louisiana. His heroic status rests on several major historical contributions:
He is credited with establishing the first major settlement of Acadians in southern Louisiana, in Loreauville, in the Broussard area of Lafayette, LA. He was buried on October 20, 1765, at the age of 62-63, laying the foundation for modern Cajun culture.
The Maternal Grandfather’s side: A deeply rooted line where the protagonist is related to him 17 different ways, filled with early American patriots. He was born in Loreauville, and died in the same parish.
The Maternal Great-Grandparents (The Peppers, the ONLY non-Acadian line on this protagonist’s direct genealogy): Newlyweds fleeing Ireland immediately after the Potato Famine, arriving in New Orleans to build a life from scratch in nearby Jeanerette, as blacksmiths. This writer’s mother recalls hearing the uniquely “sing-song” Irish accent and tones of her great-grandparents.
Rene LeBlane, the Notary Public mentioned in official records of the events occurring during that time, is also a progenitor. According to the records, he “was seized, confined, and brought away among the rest of the people, and his family, consisting of twenty children, and about one hundred and fifty grandchildren, were scattered in different colonies, so that he was put on shore at New York, with only his wife and two youngest children, in an infirm state of health, from whence he joined three more of his children at Philadelphia, where he died without any more notice being taken of him than any of us, notwithstanding his many years’ labor and deep sufferings for Your Majesty’s service.”
The themes of ancestral survival, blacksmithing / refining fire, and patriotism mirror the protagonist’s fight to survive her childhood and become a sanctuary for over 200 forgotten, abused, and medically fragile children.
To see the collection of artwork I submitted for this contest, please click this link:
https://creator.nightcafe.studio/g/select/post/ajJmPLg60BMEudjYwgSG
A collection of AI-Generated Artworks curated by Shirley Ulbrich.
Below are the contest rules, according to Nightcafe.
Getting close!
I’ve got 9 more days to wait and hopefully, gather a couple more votes for this “part 2”.
As you can see, I’ve already successfully qualified for the next round with “part 1”, but, it’s not as complete as my 2nd try, “part 2”. I’d prefer to just remove that first one, and only leave “part 2” as my only submission. However, “part 2” is not qualified yet, and until it is – it needs just 2 more – “part 1” has to stay there.
Oh, how I’d love to win this contest! I’m sure y’all know what I’ve already spent the money on, lol. (In case you are new here, and don’t know, I’d get my books published!) Woohoo!
It would be quite a relief to finally get that all done.
Genealogy is a discipline built on accuracy. One wrong assumption can unravel years of careful work. With AI becoming more common in research spaces, I wanted to see what it could realistically offer genealogists — especially those working with foreign‑language records.
What I discovered is that AI can be both a helpful assistant and a source of major problems.
AI shines in a few very specific areas:
These tasks are mechanical, not interpretive — and that’s exactly why AI performs them reasonably well. For language barriers, this can be a huge help.
Once AI moves beyond transcription and translation, the risks increase dramatically.
Even when instructed not to invent information, AI may still hallucinate — and sometimes defend those errors instead of correcting them.
These aren’t small mistakes. They can waste hours of research time and send you down dead ends.
After testing AI in multiple ways, here are the guidelines I now follow:
AI can be a helpful companion for transcription, translation, and image creation, especially when working with foreign‑language records. But as a research partner, it is unreliable. It can produce convincing but completely fabricated information — wrong connections, invented events, and imaginary record collections.
Real progress still comes from careful, manual verification.
Treat AI as a curious but unreliable assistant. Use it for language barriers, not conclusions.
My Rating: 3 out of 10 for genealogy research reliability.
P.S. Yes, yes, I know this is my “author” blog, but I’ll let you in on a little secret: I’m prepping to write another book! Hmm, I can tell, some of y’all have already picked up the vibes! Smart darlin’s, my readers.
As I was revising my contest entry documentation, I realized I was actually writing a basic outline for my next book! Oh, I feel so blessed!
Anyway, as you know, the storyline may evolve into something else, but I suspect He’s already given me my next assignment. Praying I can finish it.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.